Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- hi:cooling:cooling:blmrackcooling [2023/02/01 13:40]
p.boutachkov
+++ hi:cooling:cooling:blmrackcooling [2023/02/01 21:10] (current)
p.boutachkov
@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 {{:hi:cooling:cooling:startingconfiguration.jpg?200|}}
-  * All electronics off, AC set to 25 C. Temperature in the rack __28.3 C__. The switch and ~RPi are heating the rack.
+  * All electronics off, AC set to 25 C. Temperature in the rack __28.3 C__. The switch and RPi are heating the rack.
   * Switched on the NIM Crate. Now one can see the AC turning ON and OFF.
-[img(50%+,)[files/BLM/RackTemperature/AC25C-NIM-Crate-ON.png]]
+{{:hi:cooling:cooling:ac25c-nim-crate-on.png?200|}}
 The period of oscillation changes. It is most likely related to outside temperature.
-  * Switched the Tek ~MSO44 scope. The temperature in the rack is __28.3 C__ but there are no more oscillation. Seems the AC is ON all the time
+  * Switched the Tek MSO44 scope. The temperature in the rack is __28.3 C__ but there are no more oscillation. Seems the AC is ON all the time
   * Switched the CAEN HV, no HV ON. The temperature in the rack is __31 C__
   * Switched the DAQ electronics ON. The temperature in the rack got up to __ 34.5 C __. During the night it went down to __ 33.6 C__
   * Added a triangle shape "roof". The idea is to deflect the cod air to the side of the HV unit. This allows it to flow to the electronics below, but it cools less the HV. It creates an obstruction for the hot air to be sucked in the AC. The temperature raised by __0.5 C__,  it is now __35 C__.
-[img(30%+,)[files/BLM/RackTemperature/HVwithRoog.jpg]]
+{{:hi:cooling:cooling:hvwithroog.jpg?200|}}
   * Removed the paper "roof" and turned off the HV. The temperature stabilized at __31.7 C__
   * Removed the HV main frame, the temperature dropped from __31 C__ to __26 C __
-[img(30%+,)[files/BLM/RackTemperature/HVremoved.jpg]]
+{{:hi:cooling:cooling:hvremoved.jpg?200|}}
   * Installed the HV under the scope, above the DAQ. Turned it on. The temperature stabilized at __31.5 C __.
     * There is a possibility to measure the HVCardsTemperature. The temperature is __ 30 C__
-[img(30%+,)[files/BLM/RackTemperature/HVaboveDAQ.jpg]]
+{{:hi:cooling:cooling:hvabovedaq.jpg?200|}}
   * Installed the HV under the DAQ in place of the NIM bin. The temperature stabilized at  __ 29.5 C__. The HV card temperature is __ 29 C__.
-[img(30%+,)[files/BLM/RackTemperature/HVinsteadOfNIM.jpg]]
+{{:hi:cooling:cooling:hvinsteadofnim.jpg?200|}}
   * Installed the NIM bin above the HV and the DAQ above the NIM bin. everything is on now. The temperature stabilized at __ 29.1 C __.
-[img(30%+,)[files/BLM/RackTemperature/HVunderDAQandNIM.jpg]]
+{{:hi:cooling:cooling:hvunderdaqandnim.jpg?200|}}
   * Open the front and back door. The temperature now is __ 24 C __. The HV card temperature is 29 C. As this does not change I am not sure if the HV card reading is reliable.
   * Christian set the AC set point to __ 23 C__, hysteresis to __ +3 C__. The temperature is now __ 27 C __. The second sensor above the DAQ shows __ 27 C__ too.
     * Used the CAEN Java tool. The fan speed was set to Med. The HV card temperature was __ 28 C__ for the 24 Ch card and __ 27 C __ for the 12 Ch cards.
 I have measured the temperature above the DAQ too. Here is a photo of the second sensor read via an Arduino.
-[img(30%+,)[files/BLM/RackTemperature/secondSensorInTheRack.jpg]]
+{{:hi:cooling:cooling:secondsensorintherack.jpg?200|}}
 The temperature was the same for both sensors. Hence there is sufficient air mixing.
@@ Line 53: / Line 65: @@
 Moved the second sensor outside of the rack. It is now measuring the hall temperature.
-[img(30%+,)[files/BLM/RackTemperature/secondSensorOutsideTheRack.jpg]]
+{{:hi:cooling:cooling:secondsensoroutsidetherack.jpg?200|}}
 The outside temperature is __ 23 C__.
-* Leave the CAEN HV on, turn off the DAQ, scope and NIM crate. The temperature stabilized at __ 28 C __
+  * Leave the CAEN HV on, turn off the DAQ, scope and NIM crate. The temperature stabilized at __ 28 C __
 Observations:
-* The maximum temperature in a close rack was reached with the paper roof on to of the HV: __ 35 C__.
+  * The maximum temperature in a close rack was reached with the paper roof on to of the HV: __ 35 C__.
-* The minimum temperature in a close rack was __ 26 C__. Reached with the HV removed from the rack. Note that the AC set points is __25 C __.
+  * The minimum temperature in a close rack was __ 26 C__. Reached with the HV removed from the rack. Note that the AC set points is __25 C __.
 Therefore the AC has sufficient cooling power to take care of the system without the HV. The HV is the main heat load.
 Here is an estimate of the power generated from the electronics.
-[img(30%+,)[files/BLM/RackTemperature/heatingestimation.jpg]]
-These are the parameters of the [[DEK15|files/BLM/RackTemperature/DEK15.pdf]] and more powerful units
+{{:hi:cooling:cooling:heatingestimation.jpg?400|}}
-[[DEK20|files/BLM/RackTemperature/DEK20.pdf]] and [[DEK30|files/BLM/RackTemperature/DEK30.pdf]].
+These are the parameters of the {{ :hi:cooling:cooling:dek15.pdf | DEK15}} and more powerful units
+{{ :hi:cooling:cooling:dek20.pdf |DEK20}} and {{ :hi:cooling:cooling:dek30.pdf |DEK30}}.
 Based on the estimate we need of order of 1600-1700 W cooling power. So lets use 1750 W for the search.
-A ~DEC20 at __ 35 C __ ambient temperature should be able to cool down to __ 30 C __. This is a drop in replacement of a ~DEC15. It is 6 kg heavier than ~DEC15.
+A DEK20 at __ 35 C __ ambient temperature should be able to cool down to __ 30 C __. This is a drop in replacement of a DEK15. It is 6 kg heavier than DEK15.
+A DEK30 can cool bellow __ 20 C __ when operated at __ 35 C __ room temperature. But it requires more space and is 80 kg
+As extreme case lest take __ 40 C __ hall temperature. The the DEK20 should stabilize the rack temperature just bellow __ 35 C __. A DEK30 unit will no have problems keeping the temperature bellow __ 20 C __ even at __ 40 C __ ambient temperature.
-A ~DEC30 can cool bellow __ 20 C __ when operated at __ 35 C __ room temperature. But it requires more space and is 80 kg
+Therefore a DEK20 is the minimum suitable choice for the rack cooling. A DEK30 is to be considered if additional BLM will be operated from the same rack.
+====== Summary ======
+  * The main source of heat is the CAEN HV. The heat output of the rest is much lower.
+  * Placing the HV frame under the scope has the largest effect on the cooling efficiency in the rack.
+    * The optimum configuration is with the CAEN HV at the bottom. Speculation: there is a minimum space between the AC heat ducks and first heat generating unit above which the ordering of the units leads to small improvements.
+  * The cooling power needed to control the temperature in the rack is of order of 1700 W. I expect to add 4 more units, 2 LED drivers and 2 switching matrices. The will add of order of 40 W. Hence, I use 1750 W for the estimates
+  * A DEK15 unit operating in __ 35 C __ hall temperature will stabilize the rack temperature at around __ 40 C __.
+  * A DEK20 unit operating in  __ 35 C __ hall temperature will stabilize the rack temperature at around __ 30 C __. (Note: this is a drop in replacement of DEK15, it adds 6 kg to the roof load)
+  * A DEK30 unit can keep the rack temperature bellow __ 20 C __ even in __ 35 C __ hall.

GSI - BEA Wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools